Smith v. North Carolina Mut. Ass'n, 90 S.E. 358 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916). · Go Syfert
Smith v. North Carolina Mut. Ass'n, 90 S.E. 358 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
North Carolina Mutual &c. Association
7363.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Oct 18, 1916.
Published opinion
90 S.E. 358
1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1177
H. F. Strohecher, Sam, B. Hunter, for plaintiff., A. T. Walden, contra.
Wade.
Published
Wade, O. J.

No error of law is complained of. There was evidence to support the finding of the judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury; and this court is therefore without authority to set aside the[*662] judgment rendered. There was positive testimony that a certain written release was executed by the plaintiff, freely and voluntarily, for a valuable consideration, and there was testimony to the contrary; and the trial judge settled the conflict in favor of the defendant.

Decided October 18, 1916. Action on insurance policy; from municipal court of Macon— Judge Chambers. February 11, 1916. H. F. Strohecher, Sam, B. Hunter, for plaintiff. A. T. Walden, contra.

Judgment affirmed.