Lee v. City of Thomaston, 94 S.E. 265 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917). · Go Syfert
Lee v. City of Thomaston, 94 S.E. 265 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Lee
v.
City of Thomaston
9030.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Oct 31, 1917.
Published opinion
94 S.E. 265
1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 468
J. B. Davis, for plaintiff in error. 17. T. Allen, eon^a.
Bloodworth.
Published
Bloodworth, J.

The petition for certiorari did not affirmatively show that the petitioner had given such a bond as is required by the statute (Acts 1902, p. 105, Park’s Ann. Code, § 5191 (a)); and under the rulings in Toliver v. Wrightsville, 17 Ga. App. 345 (86 S. E. 823), Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720), and Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), the court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.