Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Mayes, 95 S.E. 371 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918). · Go Syfert
Search
Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Mayes, 95 S.E. 371 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company
v.
Mayes
8980.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Mar 15, 1918.
Published opinion
95 S.E. 371
1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 170
Samuel II. Sibley, for plaintiff in error., L. D. McGregor, John T. West, contra.
Bloodwortii.
Published
Bloodwortii, J.

While we are reluctant to interfere with a verdict approved by the presiding judge, yet in this ease the evidence as it conies to us does not show any negligence on the part of the railroad company, and the judgment of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial is Reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.