Johnson v. Est. of Farkas, 96 S.E. 392 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918). · Go Syfert
Search
Johnson v. Est. of Farkas, 96 S.E. 392 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Johnson
v.
Estate of Sam Farkas
9442.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jul 30, 1918.
Published opinion
96 S.E. 392
1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 592
Perry & Williamson, Leonard Farkas, for defendant.
Jenkins.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Jenkins, J.

A party defendant in error is essential to the prosecution of a writ of error, and where no one is named or otherwise disclosed by the bill of exceptions as defendant in error, the writ must necessarily be dismissed; for without a defendant in error there is no case. Ray v. Pease, 112 Ga. 675 (37 S. E. 875); Branch v. Mallory, 8 Ga. App. 797 (70 S. E. 177); Hendricks v. Rogers, 22 Ga. App. 357 (95 S. E. 1009); Knox v. Greenfield Estate, 7 Ga. App. 305 (66 S. E. 805).

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.