Ocilla S. R.R. v. Taylor, 96 S.E. 396 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918). · Go Syfert
Search
Ocilla S. R.R. v. Taylor, 96 S.E. 396 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ocilla Southern Railroad Company
v.
Taylor
9186.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Aug 1, 1918.
Published opinion
96 S.E. 396
1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 606
Wall & Grantham, Quincey & Rice, for plaintiff in error., Wallis & Fort, McDonald & Bennett, contra.
Bloodworth.
Published
Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition as amended.

Judgment affirmed.

Harwell, J., concurs; Broyles, P. J., dissents. Wall & Grantham, Quincey & Rice, for plaintiff in error. Wallis & Fort, McDonald & Bennett, contra.