No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stuckey
v.
State
v.
State
9770.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 16, 1918.
Published opinion
Fred Kea, for plaintiff in error., S. P. New, solicitor, contra.
Harwell.
Published
Harwell, J.
The only question involved was one of fact, which the jury determined. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, which was approved by the trial judge. No error of law appears in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Fred Kea, for plaintiff in error. S. P. New, solicitor, contra.