No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniel
v.
State
v.
State
10068.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 16, 1918.
Published opinion
Evans & Evans, for plaintiff in error., Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, contra.
Harwell.
Published
Harwell, J.
1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon objections to the admission of testimony being expressly disapproved by the trial judge, can not be considered.
2. The evidence connecting the defendant with the theft of the cow, as charged, together with the confessions, was sufficient to authorize the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.