No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tidwell
v.
State
v.
State
10172.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jan 9, 1919.
Published opinion
H. B. Moss, Mozley & Gann, for plaintiff in error., John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general, Herbert Clay, contra.
Stephens.
Published
Stephens, J.
1. The charge of the court fully and fairly submitted the case to the jury, and the exceptions thereto are entirely without merit.
2. The other assignment of error is not referred to in the brief of counsel for plaintiff-in error, and is therefore treated as abandoned.
3. The verdict is amply supported by the-evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.