Daue v. Royal Mining & Milling Co., 98 S.E. 96 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919). · Go Syfert
Search
Daue v. Royal Mining & Milling Co., 98 S.E. 96 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Daue
v.
Royal Mining and Milling Company
9839.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jan 15, 1919.
Published opinion
98 S.E. 96
1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 71
Griffith & Matthews, Hutchins & McBride, for plaintiff in error., Price Edwards, Lloyd Thomas, contra.,
Wade.
Published
Wade, C. J.

There was evidence to support the verd'iet, and none of the numerous special grounds of the motion for a new trial show such harmful error as to require a reversal.

-Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, J.J., concur.