Puckett v. Georgia Ry. & Power Co., 99 S.E. 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919). · Go Syfert
Search
Puckett v. Georgia Ry. & Power Co., 99 S.E. 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Puckett
v.
Georgia Railway & Power Company
10167.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
May 14, 1919.
Published opinion
99 S.E. 470
1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 323
Loving & Poole, for plaintiff., Colquitt & Conyers, for defendant.
Broyles.
Published
Broyles, P. J.

1. Under the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not'err in directing a verdict for the defendant, or in refusing to grant a new trial.

2. Even if the rejection of testimony as complained of in’ the motion for a new trial was error, it does not, under all the facts of the case, require a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.