Cent. of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Hartley, 103 S.E. 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). · Go Syfert
Search
Cent. of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Hartley, 103 S.E. 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fairburn & Atlanta Ry. & Elec. Co. v. Latham, 107 S.E. 88 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921)
Treatment trajectory · 1921 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1921 1973 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 263 cited at this page1 citing case
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Central of Georgia Railway Company
v.
Hartley
11199.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 7, 1920.
Published opinion
103 S.E. 262
1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 636
W. M. Goodwin, Evans & Evans, for plaintiff in error., Reuben R. Arnold, Jordan & Harris, contra.
Jenkins.
Published
Jenkins, P. J.

This case is controlled in nearly every particular by the rulings this day made in Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Hartley, ante, 110, -which was a suit by another plaintiff growing out of the same transaction. In the instant case the judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling the motion for continuance. Nor do we feel justified in holding that the amount of the verdict is excessive. Por none of the reasons assigned do we feel authorized to set the verdict aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.