Winokur v. State, 102 S.E. 902 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). · Go Syfert
Winokur v. State, 102 S.E. 902 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Winokur
v.
State
11295.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 13, 1920.
Published opinion
102 S.E. 902
1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 688
J. Hartridge Smith, for plaintiff in error., J. Saxton Daniel, solicitor-general, contra.
Broyles.
Published
Broyles, C. J.

The only error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which contained only the usual general grounds. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. '

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.