Rogers v. State, 103 S.E. 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). · Go Syfert
Search
Rogers v. State, 103 S.E. 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rogers
v.
State
11530.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jul 14, 1920.
Published opinion
103 S.E. 714
1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 19
E. M. Price, Joseph Law, for plaintiff in error,, A. L. Franklin, solicitor-general, John M. Graham, contra,
Broyles.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained, only the usual general grounds. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. E. M. Price, Joseph Law, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Ga. App.: 14/598; 16/291; 21/655; 23/144; 23/785.

A. L. Franklin, solicitor-general, John M. Graham, contra,

cited: Ga. App.: 21/493 (1) 21/49 (Cole v. State).