Mickens v. State, 110 S.E. 623 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921). · Go Syfert
Search
Mickens v. State, 110 S.E. 623 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Dillard v. State, 142 S.E. 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928)
How cited ↗
Cited for
27 Ga. App. at 601 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Dillard v. State, 142 S.E. 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).published
    Gordon Mann, for plaintiff in error, cited: 27 Ga. App. 581, 601, 603 ; 14 Ga. App. 610 ; 16 Ga. App. 201 ; 31 Ga. App. 784 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mickens
v.
State
12612.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 16, 1921.
Published opinion
110 S.E. 623
1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 280
Colley & Colley, for plaintiff in error., M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.
Bloodworth, Broyles, Lulce.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Broyles, C. J.

The evidence relied upon for the conviction of the accused was wholly circumstantial and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. It follows that his conviction was contrary to. law and the evidence and that the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.