Alexander v. State, 116 S.E. 551 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923). · Go Syfert
Search
Alexander v. State, 116 S.E. 551 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALEXANDER
v.
State
14138.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Mar 6, 1923.
Published opinion
116 S.E. 551
1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 226
H. H. Elders, for plaintiff in error., J. Saxton Daniel, solicitor-general, contra.
Luke.
Published
Luke, J.

The defendant was indicted for and convicted df the offense of larceny. The sole assignment of error is upon the[*30] ground that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. There is evidence to authorize the verdict of guilty, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. This court is therefore bound to hold that it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.