Huling v. Hargett, 116 S.E. 555 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923). · Go Syfert
Search
Huling v. Hargett, 116 S.E. 555 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Huling
v.
Hargett
14097.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Mar 7, 1923.
Published opinion
116 S.E. 555
1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 241
J. B. Lunsford, for plaintiff in error., G. 17. Huling contra.
Broyles.
Published
Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

Jugment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.