Flanigan v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 120 S.E. 646 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923). · Go Syfert
Flanigan v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 120 S.E. 646 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Flanigan
v.
Armour Fertilizer Works
14753.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Dec 7, 1923.
Published opinion
120 S.E. 646
1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 938
Colley'& Colley, Homer Legg, for plaintiff in error., Burnside & McWhorter, contra.
Jenkins.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Jenkins, B. J.

In this action upon a promissory note covering the purchase price of fertilizer, the defendant at the trial admitted the execution of the note. The record shows that all the evidence offered to sustain his plea was excluded. There are no exceptions to such exclusion, and the motion for a new trial is limited to the general grounds and an exception to the direction of a verdict for the plaintiff. The verdict being demanded and no question of law arising, the court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.