Corp. of the Royal Exch. Assurance of London v. Franklin, 124 S.E. 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924). · Go Syfert
Search
Corp. of the Royal Exch. Assurance of London v. Franklin, 124 S.E. 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance of London
v.
Franklin
13966.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Sep 19, 1924.
Published opinion
124 S.E. 391
1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 569
Middlebroolcs & Middlebroolcs, H. C. Hatcher, for plaintiff in error., C. H. & B. 8. Cohen, F. 8. Burney, contra.
Stephens.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Stephens, J.

Applying to this case (a suit upon a policy of fire-insurance) the answers of the Supreme Court to certified questions in the case (158 Ga. 644, 124 S. E. 172), the verdict found for the plaintiff for the value of the property destroyed, and attorney’s fees, was authorized under the law and the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial upon any of the general or special grounds therein contained.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.