Brazeal v. State, 129 S.E. 20 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925). · Go Syfert
Search
Brazeal v. State, 129 S.E. 20 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brazeal
v.
State
16462.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jul 14, 1925.
Published opinion
129 S.E. 20
1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 141
W. A. Dampier, for plaintiff-in error., Fred Kea, solicitor-general, contra.
Bloodwobth.
Published
Bloodwobth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains the general grounds only. There is some evidence to support the verdict, and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.