Godwin v. State, 133 S.E. 656 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926). · Go Syfert
Godwin v. State, 133 S.E. 656 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GODWIN
v.
State
17301.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jun 15, 1926.
Published opinion
133 S.E. 656
1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 933
Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error., James F. Kelly, solicitor-general, contra.
Luke.
Published
Luke, J.

Will Godwin was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. As conceded by his counsel, the evidence authorized his conviction. The special ground of the motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, in our opinion,, as ■ shown by the record, does not warrant a reversal of the judgment of the court overruling and denying the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles/ C. J., and Bloodioorth, J., concur.