No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson
v.
State
v.
State
17886.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 12, 1927.
Published opinion
H. H. Elders, for plaintiff in error., M. W. Eason, solicitor, contra.
Broyles.
Published
Broyles, C. J.
The overruling of an extraordinary motion for a new trial based solely upon alleged newly discovered evidence is complained of in this case. After a careful consideration of that evidence as disclosed by the record, we are of the opinion that it is not of such a character as would probably produce a different verdict upon another trial. Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.