No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clark
v.
State
v.
State
19995.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 12, 1929.
Published opinion
M. B. Huíanles, Norman Shattuclc, for plaintiff in error., M. Neil Andreivs, solicitor-general, contra.
Bloodworth.
Published
Bloodworth, J.
The motion for a new trial contains the general grounds only. There is some evidence to support the verdict, and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618).
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.