No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Amerson
v.
Equitable Life Assurance Society
v.
Equitable Life Assurance Society
20530.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jun 10, 1930.
Published opinion
J. P. Burnett, for plaintiffs in error., Jones, Jones, Johnston & Russell, contra.
Broyles.
Published
Broyles, C. J.
1. Under the facts of the case, as disclosed by the record, the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, directed by the court, was the only possible legal verdict that could have been rendered. No motion for a new trial was made, and the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the direction of the verdict.
2. It appearing to this court that the writ of error in this case must have been prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error, that ten per cent, damages be assessed against the plaintiff in error, is granted.
Judgment affirmed, with damages.
Luke and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.