Graham v. State, 163 S.E. 309 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932). · Go Syfert
Graham v. State, 163 S.E. 309 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Graham
v.
State
22063.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Feb 17, 1932.
Published opinion
163 S.E. 309
1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 517
John B. Gamble, Wolver M. Smith, for plaintiff in error., Henry H. West, solicitor-general, contra.
Broyles.
Published
Broyles, O. J.

The evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged (larceny of an automobile) was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guiltIt4follows that his conviction was unauthorized and that the court’s refusal to grant him a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.