B.Y.R.D. v. State, 164 S.E. 91 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932). · Go Syfert
Search
B.Y.R.D. v. State, 164 S.E. 91 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Byrd
v.
State
22130.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 30, 1932.
Published opinion
164 S.E. 91
1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 247
J. M. Lang, Townsend & Ingram, for plaintiff in error., John G. Mitchell, solicitor-general, contra.
Broyles.
Published
Broyles, C. J.

1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of evidence, fail to show reversible error.

2. Under the facts of the case the court did not err in recharging the jury without any request from them to do so.

3. The excerpts from the original charge and from the recharge of the court, complained of, do not, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole, show cause for a reversal of the judgment.

4. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. M. Lang, Townsend & Ingram, for plaintiff in error. John G. Mitchell, solicitor-general, contra.