Horton v. State, 196 S.E. 241 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938). · Go Syfert
Horton v. State, 196 S.E. 241 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Horton
v.
State
26581.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Mar 17, 1938.
Published opinion
196 S.E. 241
1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 327
B. Bari Gamp, for plaintiff in error., Stanley A. Beese, solicitor, contra.
MacIntyre.
Published
MacIntyre, J.

The defendant was convicted of a violation of Code, §§ 26-7408, 26-7409, commonly called the “labor-contract law.” After a careful reading of the brief of evidence, and of the decisions of this court and the Supreme Court construing the above sections, we are of the opinion that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, - and therefore that the trial judge erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur.