Aikens v. State, 196 S.E. 263 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938). · Go Syfert
Aikens v. State, 196 S.E. 263 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
57 Ga. App. at 536 Differentiating facts from prior case law1 citing caseGa. App. 99 (176 S. E. 919). The case of Wright v. State, 48 Ga. App. 302 (172 S. E. 687), is differentiated on. its facts from the present case. Decided March…opening of page *536 (no citing court says what it cites this page for)
  • Mason v. State, 247 S.E.2d 118 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).published
    Cf. Aikens v. State, 57 Ga. App. 535, 536 ( 196 SE 263 ); Harris v. State, 86 Ga. App. 607, 608 ( 71 SE2d 861 ); Walker v. State, 90 Ga. App. 183, 185 ( 82 SE2d 258 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AIKENS
v.
State
26674.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Mar 17, 1938.
Published opinion
196 S.E. 263
1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 331
J. W. lennard, O. L. Harris, for plaintiff in error., Allan 0. Garden, solicitor-general, contra.
MacIntyre.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
MacIntyre, J.

The special grounds of the motion for new trial are abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis, save the guilt of the accused. Whittemore v. State, 36 Ga. App. 299 (136 S. E. 806); Lamb v. State, 36 Ga. App. 306 (136 S. E. 306); Wynn v. State, 38 Ga. App. 262 (143 S. E. 599); Williams v. State, 41 Ga. App. 351 (152 S. E. 911); Johnson v. State, 41 Ga. App. 327 (152 S. E. 920); Craig v. State, 41 Ga. App. 225 (152 S. E. 494); Cook v. State, 33 Ga. App. 571 (2) (127 S. E. 156); Hale v. State, 50 [*536] Ga. App. 99 (176 S. E. 919). The case of Wright v. State, 48 Ga. App. 302 (172 S. E. 687), is differentiated on. its facts from the present case.

Decided March 17, 1938.

Judgment affii-med.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur. J. W. lennard, O. L. Harris, for plaintiff in error. Allan 0. Garden, solicitor-general, contra.