Henderson v. Curtis, 197 S.E. 65 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938). · Go Syfert
Search
Henderson v. Curtis, 197 S.E. 65 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henderson
v.
Curtis
26823.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
May 4, 1938.
Published opinion
197 S.E. 65
1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 433
Noah J. Stone, for plaintiff. G. S. Pede, for defendant.
Eeltoh.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Eeltoh, J.

Construing the petition against the plaintiff, this suit was one on an express contract, the alleged terms of which were too indefinite, vague, and uncertain to render it capable of being enforced. Therefore it was not error for the court to sustain the general demurrer to the petition. See, Henderson v. Curtis, 185 Ga. 390 (195 S. E. 152), transferring this case to this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur. Noah J. Stone, for plaintiff. G. S. Pede, for defendant.