Croft v. Cone, 199 S.E. 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938). · Go Syfert
Search
Croft v. Cone, 199 S.E. 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Croft
v.
Cone
27006.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 4, 1938.
Published opinion
199 S.E. 664
1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 80
H. L. Jaclcson, for plaintiffs in error. Horace D. Murray, contra.
MacIntyre.
Published
MacIntyre, J.

1. The only assignment of error argued or insisted on in the brief of the plaintiffs in error is that the verdict in the county court was without evidence to support it, and that the judge of the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari. It appearing that there was evidence to support the verdict, this court is without authority to reverse the judgment.

2. The evidence warranted the verdict, and the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., oonour.