Jones v. Bartlett, 92 S.E.2d 729 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956). · Go Syfert
Jones v. Bartlett, 92 S.E.2d 729 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JONES
v.
BARTLETT
36118.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 11, 1956.
Published opinion
92 S.E.2d 729
1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 848
MacDougald, Feagin & Williams, for plaintiff in error., John I. Hynds, Lee C. Bobet, contra.
Quillian.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Quillian, J.

The defendant insists that the note was without consideration because the alleged indebtedness had been satisfied by a prior judgment which was res adjudicata of the present action. The plaintiff testified that the present action was instituted for a note the consideration of which was a separate account from that for which a previous judgment was rendered against the defendant. Two> accounts may exist between the same parties so as to give two separate and distinct causes of action. Gowder v. Reeves, 61 Ga. App. 715 (7 S. E. 2d 337). There was sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in denying the motion, for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.