Stephens v. Stewart, 168 S.E.2d 325 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969). · Go Syfert
Stephens v. Stewart, 168 S.E.2d 325 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
At page 335 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Foster v. Crandell, 638 S.E.2d 526 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007).published
    App. 393, 399 , 544 S.E.2d 4, 7 (alteration original) (quoting Dickens v. Puryear, 302 N.C. 437, 452 , 276 *168 S.E.2d 325, 335 (1981)), appeal dismissed, 353 N.C. 525 , 549 S.E.2d 216 . disc, review improvidently allowed, 354 N.C. 351 , 5…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STEPHENS
v.
STEWART
43584.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 18, 1969.
Published opinion
168 S.E.2d 325
1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1191
Nall, Miller, Cadenhead ■& Dennis, A. Paul Cadenhead, Dennis J. Webb, for appellant., Joseph E. Cheeley, Charles H. Hyatt, for appellee.
Whitman.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Whitman, Judge.

The decision of this court in Stephens v. Stewart, 118 Ga. App. 811 (165 SE2d 572), has, upon certiorari, been affirmed in part and reversed in part. Stewart Stephens, 225 Ga. 185 (166 SE2d 890).

The judgment of this court is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. The ruling of these decisions as they pertain to this case is that the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict, but that it did err in charging the jury that it could impute a minor daughter’s negligence, if any, in the operation of a motor boat, to the defendant father on the basis of a Game and Fish Regulation promulgated under the Motor Boat Numbering Act of 1960.

In view of the erroneous charge, a new trial of the case is required.

Judgment reversed.

Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.