No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITY OF ATLANTA
v.
CHAFFIN CITY OF ATLANTA v. PRESLEY CITY OF ATLANTA v. PRESLEY CITY OF ATLANTA v. STANFORD
v.
CHAFFIN CITY OF ATLANTA v. PRESLEY CITY OF ATLANTA v. PRESLEY CITY OF ATLANTA v. STANFORD
46055; 46056; 46057; 46058.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 29, 1971.
Published opinion
123 Ga. App. 737
Henry L. Bowden, Charles M. Lokey, Howard P. Wallace, for appellant., Arthur A. Morrison, Hodges & Oliver, Thomas K. McWhorter, for appellees.
Bell.
Published
Bell, Chief Judge.
The city as condemnor appeals from the judgments overruling its motions for new trial in these cases. The condemnor’s motions are limited to the general grounds. The transcript reveals that the respective verdicts are within the range of the evidence and thus authorized. The judgments denying the motions for new trial are
Affirmed.
Pannell and Been, JJ., concur.