Keren Dev., Inc. v. Assessor of Greenburgh, 17 A.D.3d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2005). · Go Syfert
Keren Dev., Inc. v. Assessor of Greenburgh, 17 A.D.3d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
At page 679 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Matter of John Z., 2006 NY Slip Op 52076(U) (N.Y. Fam. Ct., Monroe Cty. 2006).unpublished
    (Anonymous) ( 17 AD3d 678, 679 [2nd Dept 2005]), "Even in the absence of direct evidence of actual abuse or neglect of a second child, a derivative finding of neglect should be made where the evidence as to the directly abused or neglected…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Keren Development, Inc.
v.
Assessor of Town of Greenburgh, (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Landmark Holdings, LLC v. Assessor of Town of Greenburgh, (Proceeding No. 2.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 25, 2005.
Published opinion
17 A.D.3d 678
2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4437
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

In two related tax certiorari proceedings pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered May 25, 2004, which granted the petitioners’ motion to compel the appellants to pay interest due on overpaid taxes in accordance with two consent judgments.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The parties entered into consent judgments settling tax certiorari proceedings brought by the petitioners. The consent judgments provided, inter alia, that interest on the tax refunds due the petitioners would be waived provided payment was made within 60 days from the date of service on the appellants of the consent judgments, “time of the essence.” The appellants admittedly failed to pay the tax refunds due the petitioners within the 60-day interest-free period. The consent judgments are legally enforceable according to their terms (see 19th St. Assoc. v State of New York, 79 NY2d 434, 442 [1992]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the appellants are responsible for the payment of interest on the tax refunds.

The appellants’ remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Fisher, JJ., concur.