People v. Saxon, 24 A.D.3d 111 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2005). · Go Syfert
People v. Saxon, 24 A.D.3d 111 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Trevor Saxon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 1, 2005.
Published opinion
24 A.D.3d 111
Published

Amended judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered October 7, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of IV2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, without appointing new counsel. The record establishes that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, that defendant received ef[*112]fective assistance of counsel, and that counsel did not take a position adverse to defendant on the motion. Defendant’s patently meritless attacks on his counsel’s performance did not create a conflict of interest requiring new counsel (see e.g. People v Faden, 1 AD3d 200 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 762 [2004]). Concur— Buckley, EJ., Tom, Saxe, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.