James Gomez v. United States Dist. Court For The N. Dist. Of California, 966 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
James Gomez v. United States Dist. Court For The N. Dist. Of California, 966 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Gomez and Daniel Vasquez
v.
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, David Fierro, Robert Harris, and Alejandro Gilbert Ruiz, Real Parties in Interest
92-70237.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 4, 1992.
Published opinion
966 F.2d 465
92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4723
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12605
Published

966 F.2d 465

James GOMEZ and Daniel Vasquez, Petitioners,
v.
The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.
David Fierro, Robert Harris, and Alejandro Gilbert Ruiz,
Real Parties In Interest.

No. 92-70237.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

June 4, 1992.

Prior Report: 9th Cir., 966 F.2d 460.

Before: ALARCON, BRUNETTI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc and the emergency motion for stay of the mandate filed April 20, 1992, are each denied as moot.