Jackson v. Carter, 29 A.D.3d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Jackson v. Carter, 29 A.D.3d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Matter of Klein v. Department of Assessment (nyappdiv, 2017-04-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Klein v. Department of Assessment
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · confidence medium
Here, the County’s evidence of recent comparable sales provided a rational basis for the Hearing Officer’s determination that a reduction in the assessed value of Klein’s property was not warranted (see Matter of Lauer v Board of Assessors, 51 AD3d at 927 ; Matter of Gershon v Nassau County Assessment Review Commn., 29 AD3d 909, 909 [2006]; Matter of Barbera v Assessor of Town of Pelham, 278 AD2d at 413 ; Matter of McNamara v Board of Assessors of Town of Smithtown, 272 AD2d 617, 617 [2000]).
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Channin v. Minoia
N.Y. App. Div. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
"When the [j]udicial Hearing Officer's determinations are contested, the court is limited to ascertaining whether those determinations have a rational basis" ( Matter of Lauer v Board of Assessors , 51 AD3d 926, 927 [2d Dept 2008]; see Matter of Gershon v Nassau County Assessment Review Commn. , 29 AD3d 909, 909 [2d Dept 2006]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Erwin Jackson
v.
Jerald S. Carter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 23, 2006.
29 A.D.3d 909
Published

Proceeding pursuant to[*910] CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, in effect, to prohibit the respondent, a Judge of the County Court, Nassau County, from proceeding with a criminal action entitled People v Jackson, pending under Nassau County Indictment No. 2826/05, and application for poor person relief.

Ordered that the branch of the application which is for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the .filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to a writ of prohibition (see Matter of Carey v Kitson, 93 AD2d 50 [1983]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Dillon, JJ., concur.