Henning v. Ritz, 44 A.D.3d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2007). · Go Syfert
Henning v. Ritz, 44 A.D.3d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Mary K. Henning
v.
Robert A. Ritz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 30, 2007.
Published opinion
44 A.D.3d 1005
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered January 11, 1999, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Giacomo, J.), entered April 25, 2006, as directed a hearing on his application for an award of counsel fees.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

An order directing a hearing to aid in the determination of a motion does not dispose of the motion and does not affect a substantial right, and therefore is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; Kornblum v Kornblum, 34 AD3d 749 [2006]; Berliner v Berliner, 294 AD2d 524 [2002]). Any party[*1006] aggrieved by an order entered subsequent to the hearing may take an appeal from that order (see Berliner v Berliner, 294 AD2d at 525). Since leave to appeal has not been granted, we dismiss the appeal. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Dillon, JJ., concur.