Paul D. Schug v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 972 F.2d 348 (6th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Paul D. Schug v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 972 F.2d 348 (6th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James Walther v. Fla. Tile, Inc. (ca6, 2019-06-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" James Walther v. Fla. Tile, Inc.
6th Cir. · 2019 · signal: accord · confidence high
Cir. 1982); accord Spar Gas, Inc. v. AP Propane, Inc., 972 F.2d 348 , at *2 (6th Cir. July 22, 1992) (Table) (collecting cases). -11- No. 18-3747, Walther v. Fla. Tile, Inc. Florida Tile claims the district court erred by finding that Florida Tile could use its work product in this case—such as its Rule 12(c) motion—in any subsequent case brought by Walther.
discussed Cited "see" Samosky v. United Parcel Service
S.D.W. Va · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ryberg v. Indoor Soccer Club of Cleveland, 972 F.2d 348 , 1992 WL 181944, *3 (6th Cir.1992) (“The situation being such that plaintiffs did not even attempt to begin the arbitration process on their own, plaintiffs cannot now be heard to argue that arbitration was rendered futile by defendants.”) (unpublished).
discussed Cited "see" Kerwin v. Paul Revere Life Insurance
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spar Gas, Inc. v. AP Propane, Inc., No. 91-6040, 1992 WL 172129, at *3 , 972 F.2d 348 (6th Cir.) (unpublished disposition) (directing the district court on remand “to hold a hearing, request additional briefing, or use whatever other procedure it deems appropriate in the exercise of its discretion, to obtain the information and evidence necessary to its [attorneys’ fees] determination”); cf. Damach, Inc. v. City of Hartford, No. 99-9319, 2000 WL 1876787 , at *3, 239 F.3d 155 (2d Cir.) (noting that remand to allow for additional briefing may be appropriate “to provide the district c…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio
N.D. Ohio · 2024 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Perrino v. City of Newton Falls, 972 F.2d 348 (Table), 1992 WL 197328, at *5 (6th Cir. Aug. 14, 1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul D. Schug
v.
Secretary of Health and Human Services
92-1062.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Aug 11, 1992.
972 F.2d 348
Unpublished

972 F.2d 348

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Paul D. SCHUG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-1062.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 11, 1992.

Before DAVID A. NELSON, ALAN E. NORRIS and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Paul D. Schug appeals a district court affirming the Secretary's denial of social security disability benefits. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a). Counsel for both parties have waived oral argument.

2

Schug filed an application with the Secretary, alleging that he suffered from head, neck and shoulder injuries. Following a hearing, the administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that Schug was not disabled because he had the residual functional capacity to perform a significant number of jobs in the regional and national economy. The Appeals Council affirmed the ALJ's determination. Schug then filed a complaint seeking judicial review of the Secretary's decision. The district court determined that the Secretary's decision was supported by substantial evidence and granted summary judgment for the defendant. Schug has filed a timely appeal.

3

Upon review, we determine that substantial evidence exists to support the Secretary's decision. Brainard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 889 F.2d 679, 681 (6th Cir.1989) (per curiam).

4

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion filed on November 27, 1991. Rule 9(b)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.