Altmann v. Molead, 51 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2008). · Go Syfert
Altmann v. Molead, 51 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
At page 483 Granting summary judgment on lack of factual issue2 citing casesfor summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them and also granted summary judgment to nonmoving defendants Johnson and St. Barnabas, unanimously…opening of page *483 (no citing court says what it cites this page for)
  • Wilk, Joanne v. James, 107 A.D.3d 1480 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2013).published
    Even assuming, arguendo, that decedent’s injuries and death were caused by a rupturing aortic dissection and that such condition was present on the relevant treatment dates, it is my view that plaintiff’s expert failed to set forth an evid…
  • Carlton v. St. Barnabas Hosp., 91 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012).published
    The defense offered expert testimony that, in light of decedent’s symptoms and complaints, he was appropriately diagnosed with lumbosacral sprain/strain and possible radiculopathy, and referred to a neurologist (see Altmann v Molead, 51 AD…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cynthia Altmann
v.
Michael Molead, M.D., and Bobby J. Johnson, M.D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 8, 2008.
Published opinion
51 A.D.3d 482
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson J.), entered March 20, 2007, which granted the motion by defendants Stiller and Bronx Lebanon[*483] for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them and also granted summary judgment to nonmoving defendants Johnson and St. Barnabas, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In response to the prima facie showing by Stiller and Bronx Lebanon, in this medical malpractice action, based on the hospital records, deposition testimony and the affirmation of an expert in emergency medicine, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact. The affirmation of plaintiffs expert was insufficient to contradict defendants’ expert testimony that plaintiff was appropriately diagnosed with bronchitis given her symptoms. His claim that defendants should have detected plaintiffs endocarditis was conclusory and unsupported by the record (see Wong v Goldbaum, 23 AD3d 277 [2005]). Summary judgment was also properly granted to defendants Johnson and St. Barnabas upon a search of the record (CPLR 3212 [b]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.