Haywood v. Harris, 70 A.D.3d 1334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Haywood v. Harris, 70 A.D.3d 1334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases · …the requirements of family court act 321.3 are mandatory and nonwaivable at p. 1335 ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: In re Celina D. (nyappdiv, 2016-12-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In re Celina D.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
We further note that respondent was not required to preserve her contention for our review inasmuch as “the requirements of Family Court Act § 321.3 are mandatory and nonwaivable” (Matter of Dakota L.K., 70 AD3d 1334, 1335 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) D., CELINA, MTR. OF
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
We further note that respondent was not required to preserve her contention for our review -2- 1259 CAF 16-00476 inasmuch as “the requirements of Family Court Act § 321.3 are mandatory and nonwaivable” (Matter of Dakota L.K., 70 AD3d 1334, 1335 [internal quotation marks omitted]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In re Celina D.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
We further note that respondent was not required to preserve her contention for our review inasmuch as “the requirements of Family Court Act § 321.3 are mandatory and nonwaivable” (Matter of Dakota L.K., 70 AD3d 1334, 1335 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) M., JOHNATHAN B., MTR. OF
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
“Because the period of respondent’s placement has expired, the petition must be dismissed” (Sean R.P., 24 AD3d at 1201 ; see Matter of Alex Z., 82 AD3d 995, 996 [2011]; cf. Matter of Dakota L.K., 70 AD3d 1334, 1335 [2010]; Matter of Tyler D., 64 AD3d 1243, 1243 [2009]; Franklin M., 11 AD3d at 470 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In re Daquan BB.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · confidence medium
Preliminarily, we reject petitioner’s contention that respondent was required to preserve this claim for our review (see Matter of Dakota L.K., 70 AD3d 1334, 1335 [2010]; Matter of Tyler D., 64 AD3d 1243, 1244 [2009]; Matter of Sean R.P., 24 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 711 [2006]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Lamont Haywood
v.
Audrey Harris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 11, 2010.
70 A.D.3d 1334
Published

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Patricia E. Gallaher, J.), entered July 21, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, insofar as appealed from, dismissed in part the amended petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court. Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, Pine and Gorski, JJ.