In re Christy C., 77 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Christy C., 77 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 5× by 3 distinct cases, 2017–2024 · …an appeal from an intermediate or final order in a case involving abuse or neglect may be taken as of right at p. 563 ✓
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Matter of Jayla A. (Chelsea K.--Isaac C.) (nyappdiv, 2017-06-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Jayla A. (Chelsea K.--Isaac C.)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
At the outset, we note that although Family Court subsequently issued a combined order of fact-finding and disposition, and although no appeal has been taken from that order, we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal inasmuch as “[a]n appeal from an intermediate or final order in a case involving abuse or neglect may be taken as of right” (Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; see Matter of Christy C. [Roberto C.], 77 AD3d 563, 563 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 712 [2011]; Matter of Krystal F. [Liza R.], 68 AD3d 670, 670 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Jalicia G. (Jacqueline G.)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
Her appeal from the fact-finding order of neglect was not affected by the subsequent entry of an order of disposition because the intermediate order is appealable as of right (Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; see Matter of Christy C. [Roberto C.], 77 AD3d 563 [1st Dept 2010]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matter of AL.C. (2×)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Under the Family Court Act, this Court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal because "[a]n appeal from an intermediate or final order in a case involving abuse or neglect may be taken as of right" ( see Family Court Act § 1112[a]; see also Matter of Cristy C. [Roberto C.], 77 AD3d 563, 563 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 712 [2011]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matter of AL.C. (2×)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Under the Family Court Act, this Court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal because "[a]n appeal from an intermediate or final order in a case involving abuse or neglect may be taken as of right" ( see Family Court Act § 1112[a]; see also Matter of Cristy C. [Roberto C.], 77 AD3d 563, 563 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 712 [2011]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Christy C., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Roberto C., Appellant Administration for Children's Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 26, 2010.
77 A.D.3d 563
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about August 13, 2009, which, insofar as appealed from, after a fact-finding hearing, found that respondent father neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to the agency’s argument that this appeal from the order of fact-finding should be dismissed, although a dispositional order was subsequently issued in this case, it was not a final order since it placed the child with the Commissioner of Social Services until the completion of the next scheduled permanency hearing. In any event, this Court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal since “[a]n appeal from an intermediate or final order in a case involving abuse or neglect may be taken as of right” (Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; see Matter of Krystal F. [Liza R.], 68 AD3d 670 [2009]).

The finding of neglect was supported by a preponderance of the evidence, which established that the father failed to protect the child from the mother’s erratic behavior brought on by her mental illness and substance abuse issues (see Matter of [*564] Stephanie S. [Ruben S.], 70 AD3d 519 [2010]; Matter of Miyani M. [George T.], 4 AD3d 430 [2004]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Catterson, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.