People v. Senior, 81 A.D.3d 1292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Senior, 81 A.D.3d 1292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases · …based on the minutes and the jury verdict sheet, ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Matter of Lynch v. Annucci (nyappdiv, 2017-06-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Lynch v. Annucci
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · confidence medium
Petitioner’s convictions were affirmed upon appeal (People v Lynch, 81 AD3d 1292, 1292-1293 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 807 [2011]), and he thereafter commenced a habeas corpus proceeding in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Williams
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
Defendant’s contention that the court erred in failing to correct an alleged inconsistency between the verdict sheet and the jury’s response to the poll concerning its verdict on the third count of the indictment is unpreserved for our review (see People v Mercado, 91 NY2d 960, 963 [1998]; People v Shaver, 86 AD3d 800, 802-803 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 962 [2012], reconsideration denied 19 NY3d 967 [2012]; People v Lynch, 81 AD3d 1292, 1292-1293 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 807 [2011]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Williams
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
Defendant’s contention that the court erred in failing to correct an alleged inconsistency between the verdict sheet and the jury’s response to the poll concerning its verdict on the third count of the indictment is unpreserved for our review (see People v Mercado, 91 NY2d 960, 963 [1998]; People v Shaver, 86 AD3d 800, 802-803 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 962 [2012], reconsideration denied 19 NY3d 967 [2012]; People v Lynch, 81 AD3d 1292, 1292-1293 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 807 [2011]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Shaver
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · confidence medium
Defendant’s argument concerning this error — the clerk asking about the wrong degree — is unpreserved for our review because he failed to object before the jury was discharged, at a time when Supreme Court could have addressed and remedied the error (see People v Lynch, 81 AD3d 1292, 1292-1293 [2011]; People v Nairne, 258 AD2d 671 , 671 [1999], Iv denied 93 NY2d 1003 [1999]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Jermaine O. Senior
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 10, 2011.
81 A.D.3d 1292
Published

— Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael F. Pietruszka, J.), rendered Januaiy 12, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.