Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Alke.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Alke Anchor | green | “served to alleviate any potential prejudice resulting from the admission of the evidence” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Crampe | green | “aware of the dangers and disadvantages of proceeding without counsel” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Meseck | green | “recited its discretionary balancing of the probity of such evidence against its potential for prejudice” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Bullock | green | “while egregious conduct by defendants can lead to a deemed forfeiture of the fundamental right to counsel' . . . there was no such conduct by defendant here to warrant 'an extreme, last-resort forfeiture analysis” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Senior | green | “based on the minutes and the jury verdict sheet,” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Blair | green | “defendant opened the door to the redirect examination by only partially exploring on cross-examination the issue whether the witness and defendant had engaged in criminal activity together in the past, rendering further examination and clarification on that issue appropriate” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Williams | green | “the convictions that the people seek to use are for crimes of individual dishonesty, the convictions should usually be admitted on a trial for similar charges, notwithstanding the risk of possible prejudice, because the very issue on which the offer is made is that of the veraci…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.