Ortiz v. Bezio, 84 A.D.3d 1605 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Ortiz v. Bezio, 84 A.D.3d 1605 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Applegate v. Fischer, 89 A.D.3d 1303 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2011)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 1605 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Applegate v. Fischer, 89 A.D.3d 1303 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2011).published
    As such, petitioner has been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled and his challenge to the disciplinary determination must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Walker v Fischer, 84 AD3d 1659, 1659-1660 [2011]; Matter of Ortiz…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of William Ortiz
v.
Norman R. Bezio, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 19, 2011.
Published opinion
84 A.D.3d 1605
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a number of prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s disciplinary record. Accordingly, given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Brown v Fischer, 77 AD3d[*1606] 1004, 1005 [2010]; Matter of Harrison v Bezio, 77 AD3d 1000 [2010]).

Mercure, J.E, Rose, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without .costs.