Frankie Ray Shumate, Jr. v. Edward W. Murray, Dir., Virginia Dep't of Corr., 983 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Frankie Ray Shumate, Jr. v. Edward W. Murray, Dir., Virginia Dep't of Corr., 983 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we affirm the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of on the grounds that failed to present any evidence upon which a reasonable jury could find that breached the term of its 1985 loan agreement.”
37 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Beskrone v. KORE Capital Corporation (ded, 2024-03-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Beskrone v. KORE Capital Corporation
D. Del. · 2024 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
we affirm the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of on the grounds that failed to present any evidence upon which a reasonable jury could find that breached the term of its 1985 loan agreement.
cited Cited "see" In Re Silver
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Richardson v. Pitt County (In re Stroud Wholesale, Inc.), 47 B.R. 999 (E.D.N.C.1985), aff 'd, 983 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see" Reed v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
D. Maryland · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rock v. Oster Corp., 810 F.Supp. 665, 667 (D.Md.1991) (granting summary judgment for defendant on plaintiffs express warranty claim because the alleged warranty was “immaterial” to the injury suffered by plaintiff), aff'd, 983 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir.1993); Lowe v. Sporicidin Internat’l, 47 F.3d 124, 132 (4th Cir.1995).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Knupfer (In Re PW, LLC)
9th Cir. BAP · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Richardson v. Pitt County (In re Stroud Wholesale, Inc.), 47 B.R. 999, 1002 (E.D.N.C.1985), aff'd mem., 983 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir.1986); Scherer v. Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." WBQ Partnership v. Commonwealth Department of Medical Assistance Services (In Re WBQ Partnership)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 1995 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e.g., In re Healthco Int’l, Inc., 174 B.R. 174, 176 (Bankr.D.Mass.1994) (holding that the terms “money satisfaction mean “a payment constituting less than full payment of the underlying debt”), with Richardson v. Pitt County (In re Stroud Wholesale, Inc.), 47 B.R. 999, 1003 (E.D.N.C.1985) (holding that the terms “money satisfaction” mean “full satisfaction of creditors’ interests” in liquidation sales), aff'd per curiam, 983 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir.1986) (unpublished disposition). 10 However, the case at hand presents a situation that is different from both Healthco and S…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Joshua Michael Samson, A/K/A Michael S. Edwards v. Warden, of Mecklenburg
4th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Stamper v. Muncie, 944 F.2d 170, 178 (4th Cir.1991) (Monday morning quarterbacking of trial tactics is prohibited under Strickland ), dismissal of habeas petition aff'd, 983 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir.) (table); cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1069 (1993); Evans v. Thompson, 881 F.2d 117, 125 (4th Cir.1989) (decision not to object to prosecutor's comments is a tactical decision), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frankie Ray Shumate, Jr.
v.
Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
92-6655.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 20, 1993.
983 F.2d 1057

983 F.2d 1057

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frankie Ray SHUMATE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-6655.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 4, 1992
Decided: January 20, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-91-671-N)

Frankie Ray Shumate, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Frankie Shumate seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.[*] Shumate v. Murray, No. CA-91-671-N (E.D. Va. May 22, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

Shumate's motion for a transcript to be provided at government expense is denied