At page 817 Determining ineligibility for public housing based on conduct3 citing casesvisits and gifts from biological father’s family is no substitute for visits and gifts from the biological father under Domestic Relations Law § 111 (6) (a)
- In re Mathew Niko M., 71 A.D.3d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2010).publishedJ., 84 AD2d 816, 817 [1981]), nor are the contacts and communications by the paternal grandmother with the child imputed to respondent (see e.g.
- In re Seasia D., 46 A.D.3d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2007).published(visits and gifts from biological father’s family is no substitute for visits and gifts from the biological father under Domestic Relations Law § 111 (6) (a))
- In re Joshua II., 296 A.D.2d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2002).publishedIn any event, the isolated efforts testified to by respondent are insufficient to preclude a finding of abandonment (see, Matter of Erika G., 289 AD2d 803, 804 ; Matter of Michael E.J., supra at 817; see also, Matter of Taylor R., 290 AD2d…
Other citing cases
- Blatt v. New York City Hous. Auth., 123 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1986).published
v.
Joseph J. Christian, as Chairman of the New York City Housing Authority
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Housing Authority that petitioner was ineligible for public housing, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated July 7, 1980, denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and petition granted, to the extent that the determination is' annulled, and the matter is remitted to respondent for a new determination as to eligibility. The determination that petitioner was ineligible for public housing because of threats allegedly made by him when he was interviewed by a housing project manager after being found eligible, without more, does not amount to a pattern of dangerous conduct, as required by the authority’s standards for admission before ineligibility is found. Cohalan, J. P., Margett, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.