G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…the contents of an insurer's claim file which have been prepared for litigation against its insured are immune from disclosure
at p. 383
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
De Luca v. De Luca
The motion court providently exercised its discretion in quashing the subpoenas for nonparty Chachko's banking records issued by the husband ( see Grotallio v Soft Drink Leasing Corp. , 97 AD2d 383, 383 [1st Dept 1983]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Arlus Owner LLC v. 829 Mad. Ave. LLC
A subpoena that demands “any” and “all” documents is overbroad since it may encompass some materials that are be privileged or “clearly irrelevant.” Grotallio v Soft Drink Leasing Corp., 97 AD2d at 383 (1st Dept. 1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Springer v. Tishman Speyer Props., LP
Here, Schindler's request for deposition testimony as to communications between Tishman and Christie's and their insurers was improper because the information is confidential ( see Grotallio v Soft Drink Leasing Corp. , 97 AD2d 383, 383 [1st Dept 1983] ["[t]he contents of an insurer's claim file which have been prepared for litigation against its insured are immune from disclosure"]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Springer v. Tishman Speyer Props., LP
Here, Schindler's request for deposition testimony as to communications between Tishman and Christie's and their insurers was improper because the information is confidential ( see Grotallio v Soft Drink Leasing Corp. , 97 AD2d 383, 383 [1st Dept 1983] ["[t]he contents of an insurer's claim file which have been prepared for litigation against its insured are immune from disclosure"]).
cited
Cited "see"
CK Opportunities Fund I, L.P. v. Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc.
See Grotallio v Soft Drink Leasing Corp., 97 AD2d 383 (1st Dept. 1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Riverside Ctr. Site 5 Owner LLC v. Lexington Ins. Co.
See Grotallio v Soft Drink Leasing Corp., 97 AD2d 383 (1st Dept. 1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Peter Landau, an Attorney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 18, 1983.
Published
Motion granted and respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Ross and Fein, JJ.