Di Prosa v. Post Corp., 99 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 1984). · Go Syfert
Di Prosa v. Post Corp., 99 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank Di Prosa, Appellant-Respondent
v.
Post Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 27, 1984.
Published opinion
99 A.D.2d 653
1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16904

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs, and motion to amend record to include cross appeal granted. Memorandum: We affirm the order setting aside the verdict on the second cause of action for reasons stated at Trial Term. With respect to the first cause of action pertaining to the claim for severance pay, defendants have failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of lack of consideration for the promise to pay. The sole factual issue submitted to the jury in the court’s charge and in the special questions was whether defendants made an outright promise to pay plaintiff’s salary for 26 weeks or whether they said that the payments would stop if plaintiff got another job within that period. There was no exception to the charge, and the record shows that defendants made no objection during the trial or on the posttrial motions to the legal theory on which the case was submitted. (Appeals from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Smith, J. — employment contract.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Green, O’Donnell and Moule, JJ.