484 N.Y.S.2d at 835 Distinguishing breach of contract from fraud claims13 citing casesstating that “[a] failure to perform promises of future acts is merely a breach of contract
- OCFBrook Holdings, LLC v. TKS Brooklyn Ctr. Holding, LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op 51611(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).unpublishedA cause of action for fraud does not arise when the only fraud charged relates to a breach of contract." Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co. Ltd. , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dept. 1985).
- Buckman v. Calyon Sec. (usa) Inc., 817 F. Supp. 2d 322 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).publishedA cause of action for fraud does not arise when the only fraud charged relates to a breach of contract.’ ”) (quoting Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co., 108 A.D.2d 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dep’t 1985)). 99 .
- Trepel v. Abdoulaye, 185 F. Supp. 2d 308 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).publishedDamon & Co., Inc. v. Softkey Software Products, Inc., 811 F.Supp. 986, 992 (S.D.N.Y.1993) (citing Tesoro Petroleum Corporation v. Holborn Oil Company Ltd., 108 A.D.2d 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (App. Div. 1st Dep’t 1985)).
- Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. v. IMAGING DIAGNOSTIC Sys., 176 F. Supp. 2d 199 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).published Damon & Co., Inc. v. Softkey Software Products, Inc., 811 F.Supp. 986, 992 (S.D.N.Y.1993) (citing Tesoro Petroleum Corporation v. Holborn Oil Company Ltd., 108 A.D.2d 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dep’t 1985)).
- Papa's-June Music, Inc. v. McLean, 921 F. Supp. 1154 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).published Co., 159 A.D.2d 698, 700 , 553 N.Y.S.2d 187, 189 (2d Dep’t.1990); Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holbom Oil Co., 108 A.D.2d 607, 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dep’t.1985); Sudul, 868 F.Supp. at 63 ; Best Western Int’l, Inc., 1994 WL 465905 ,…
- Update Traffic Sys., Inc. v. Gould, 857 F. Supp. 274 (E.D.N.Y. 1994).publishedTesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co. Ltd., 108 A.D.2d 607, 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dept.1985).
- LTV Aerospace & Def. Co. v. Thomson-CSF, S.A. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.), 155 B.R. 636 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1993).publishedA cause of action for fraud does not arise when the only fraud charged relates to a breach of contract.” Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co., Ltd., 108 A.D.2d 607, 608 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dep’t), appeal dismissed, 65 N.Y.2d…
- Deligiannis v. PepsiCo, Inc., 757 F. Supp. 241 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).publishedLanzi v. Brooks, 54 A.D.2d 1057 , 388 N.Y.S.2d 946 *254 (3d Dept.1976), aff 'd, 43 N.Y.2d 778 , 402 N.Y.S.2d 384 , 373 N.E.2d 278 (1977); Radish Pharmacy, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York, Inc., 114 A.D.2d 439 , 494 N…
- Words, Inc. v. Xerox Corp., No. 99-1182 (4th Cir. Mar. 2, 2000).unpublishedSee Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co., Ltd., 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (N.Y.
- Sado v. Israel, 882 F. Supp. 1401 (S.D.N.Y. 1995).published See Tesoro Petroleum v. Holborn Oil, 108 A.D.2d 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dep’t 1985).
Show 3 more citing cases
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. LTV Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.), 156 B.R. 391 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).published See Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co., 108 A.D.2d 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dep’t), appeal dismissed, 65 N.Y.2d 637 (1985); Geler v. National Westminster Bank USA, 770 F.Supp. 210, 213 (S.D.N.Y.1991); Airlines Reporting Corp…
- R.H. Damon & Co. v. Softkey Software Prods., Inc., 811 F. Supp. 986 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).published See Tesoro Petroleum Corporation v. Holborn Oil Company Ltd., 108 A.D.2d 607, 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dep’t 1985).
- Kenevan v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 791 F. Supp. 75 (S.D.N.Y. 1992).published See also Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holbom Oil Co., Ltd,., 108 A.D.2d 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1985) (stating that “[a] failure to perform promises of future acts is merely a breach of contract”).
At page 607 Determining the scope of the statute of limitations3 citing cases
- Natura Dev. N.V. v. HEH Advisors LLC, No. 1:19-cv-01797-PKC (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2020).Damon & Co., Inc. v. Softkey Software Products, Inc., 811 F. Supp. 986, 992 (S.D.N.Y.1993) (citing Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co. Ltd., 108 A.D.2d 607, 607 (1st Dep’t 1985), appeal dismissed, 65 N.Y.2d 637 (N.Y. 1985).).
- Cronos Grp. Ltd. v. XComIP, LLC, 156 A.D.3d 54 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2017).published Thus, the allegedly false promise at issue in the fraud claim was, according to the complaint, a promise to perform under the parties' contract, not any promise collateral or extraneous to that contract ( see Havell Capital , 84 AD3d at 58…
- Papa's-June Music, Inc. v. McLean, 921 F. Supp. 1154 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).published Co., 159 A.D.2d 698, 700 , 553 N.Y.S.2d 187, 189 (2d Dep’t.1990); Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holbom Oil Co., 108 A.D.2d 607, 607 , 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dep’t.1985); Sudul, 868 F.Supp. at 63 ; Best Western Int’l, Inc., 1994 WL 465905 ,…
q1 “falsely promised to perform 'future acts”1 citing case
- Cronos Grp. Ltd. v. XComIP, LLC, 156 A.D.3d 54 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2017).published Thus, the allegedly false promise at issue in the fraud claim was, according to the complaint, a promise to perform under the parties' contract, not any promise collateral or extraneous to that contract ( see Havell Capital , 84 AD3d at 58…
Other citing cases
- Sudul v. Comput. Outsourcing Servs., 868 F. Supp. 59 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).published
- R. Freedman & Son, Inc. v. A.I. Credit Corp., 226 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1996).published
- Manhattan Film, Inc. v. Ent. Guarantees, Ltd., 156 A.D.2d 152 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1989).published
v.
Holborn Oil Company Limited
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (B. Wright, J.), entered July 31, 1984, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the fourth cause of action in the complaint, is reversed, on the law, to the extent appealed from, and the motion by defendants to dismiss the fourth cause of action granted, without costs.
Plaintiff alleged in its complaint breach of contract by defendants, and, in the fourth cause of action, fraud in the inducement of the contract. Plaintiff asserted that defendants’ agent falsely assured plaintiff’s employee that defendants would perform under the contract and that the representation was made with the intent to deceive. However, plaintiff did not allege that defendants breached any duty owed to plaintiff separate and apart from the contractual duty when they misrepresented their intent to perform as promised. Nor has plaintiff claimed any special damages proximately caused by the false representation, not recoverable under the contract measure of damages. Consequently, the fourth cause of action was redundant and should have been dismissed.
A failure to perform promises of future acts is merely a breach of contract to be enforced by an action on the contract. A cause of action for fraud does not arise when the only fraud charged relates to a breach of contract (see, Wegman v Dairylea Coop., 50 AD2d 108, 113, lv dismissed 38 NY2d 918; Miller v Volk & Huxley, 44 AD2d 810). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.