People v. Harris, 110 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Harris, 110 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. McShaw (nyappdiv, 1986-08-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. McShaw
N.Y. App. Div. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a " 'rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt’ ” (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 , quoting from Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307, 319 ; see, People v Herriot, 110 AD2d 851, 852 ).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Bulerin
N.Y. App. Div. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Despite certain minor inconsistencies in the physical description of the defendant provided by the sole eyewitness, the weight and reliability to be accorded to his testimony was a matter for the jury, and his testimony does not "compel the conclusion that a reasonable doubt existed as a matter of law” (People v La Borde, 76 AD2d 869, 870 ; see, People v Herriot, 110 AD2d 851 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Vincent Harris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 22, 1985.
110 A.D.2d 851
1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48759
Published

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.